| QUINN BILL UPDATE |
|
|
|
CONTACT MCOP IMMEDIATELY IF YOUR TOWN ALTERS QUINN BENEFITS!The Commonwealth’s FY2010 budget – which projects that the reimbursement to towns for FY09 Quinn bill payments to officers will be less than 50% – has led towns across the state to engage in premature and illegal actions regarding payments to officers. MCOP is committed to protecting the rights of its members, and has undertaken an aggressive campaign to ensure that Quinn bill payments are made.First and Foremost, the Quinn Bill (codified at M.G.L. c. 41, §108L) mandates that officers “shall be granted” educational incentives related to law enforcement degrees. The Quinn Bill does not allow for payments to be reduced or reimbursed based on whether or not the state fully reimburses a Town for prior payments to officers. M.G.L. c. 41, §108L is clear, assuming proper certification of a degree, an officer:shall be granted a base salary increase of ten per cent upon attaining an associate’s degree in law enforcement or sixty points earned to a baccalaureate degree in law enforcement, a twenty per cent increase upon attaining a baccalaureate degree in law enforcement, and a twenty‐five per cent increase upon attaining a master’s degree in law enforcement or for a degree in law. COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS CANNOT AMEND THE QUINN BILLWhile the Quinn bill is clear in the level of “base salary increases” due to officers, many collective bargaining agreements purport to modify those increases. SUCH PROVISIONS ARE NOT LEGAL.1 By law, a town and its unions cannot alter statutory requirements unless the statute at issue is specifically listed in the public sector union law, M.G.L. c. 150E, §7(d). The Quinn bill is not listed in that law, so a town and a union cannot agree to change it. The Supreme Judicial Court has noted “that municipalities and public employee unions may not bargain over matters covered by” the Quinn Bill. Rooney v. Yarmouth, Rooney v. Yarmouth, 410 Mass. 485, 493 n.4 (1991). ANY REDUCTION IN QUINN BILL PAYMENTS IS PREMATUREEven if it was legal for a town and union to agree to reduce Quinn payments, any reductions now are entirely premature. Under the Quinn statute, municipalities tell the state how much they paid to officers in the prior fiscal year by September of the current year. Thus, the request for FY09 reimbursement will not even be finalized until September, with the monies to be reimbursed in April or May of 2010. While the just passed budget would not cover the state’s full “share” of anticipated Quinn Bill reimbursement, at anytime between now and the end of FY2010 a supplemental appropriation could provide greater funding. Therefore, it is premature for any city or town to be proposing reducing Quinn payments NOW based on the just passed FY2010 budget. YOU ARE NOT ALONE – DON’T BARGAIN WITH THE TOWN OVER QUINN ALONERegardless of the variety of contracts out there, ALL MCOP locals should be on the same page when it comes to Quinn Bill payments. And that page says that ALL officers should get ALL of the Quinn Bill to which they are entitled! Please do not sit down with your City and Town and agree to ANY reduction in Quinn without reaching out to MCOP first. As noted above, MCOP believes that Towns CANNOT LEGALLY REDUCE QUINN PAYMENTS, regardless of your contract language. We WILL FIGHT to defend that position, but we cannot help you if you don’t let us know what’s going on BEFORE you enter into an agreement with your town.
1 We note that this position was recently endorsed by the General Counsel to the Chief’s Association. Strange times make for strange bedfellows indeed. |




News